Me sorprende cómo algunas personas no cambian y dejan de estar inmersas en los problemas de siempre pese al paso de los años. Ojalá yo no esté cayendo en lo mismo sin percatarme…
http://trendsandstrategies.blogspot.com.au/2010/04/enneagram-and-mbti.html
interesting diagram
Esto es curioso, ayer unos amigos y yo estuvimos discutiendo el eneagrama y me enteré de estas clasificaciones de pensamiento, sentimiento e instinto. Me pasaron otro test para hacer y el puntaje más alto lo obtuve en un 4, pero la triada que más me dominaba resultó ser el pensamiento. Y sí… me identifico más con la triada mencionada pero tengo un 4 muy, muy fuerte (de hecho, obtuve el puntaje más alto en 4 mientras que el más bajo fue en 3 xD). Y viendo este gráfico me doy cuenta de cuán desastroza puede ser mi mente, viviendo entre el corazón y la cabeza y dejando de lado la realidad del “hacer”.
A veces creo que soy muy racional para ser artista y muy sensible para ser una buscadora de conocimiento objetivo. Y odio la mediocridad ):
From 機動天使エンジェリックレイヤー天上の翼 (Mobile Angel Angelic Layer Wings of Heaven) light novel.
Never mess with Icchan!!!
Another common misunderstanding is that INFJs are controlling or closed-minded. This typically stems from INFJs’ tendency to extravert Judging (Fe). But as I’ve described elsehwhere, IJs are often better understood as Perceivers because their dominant function (e.g., Ni) is a Perceiving function. In actuality, INFJs, especially those further along in their type development, are surprisingly adaptable and open-minded. While rarely wearing their openness on their sleeves, as ENFPs are wont to do, INFJs can be surprisingly open to unique or unconventional relational practices.
Nor is it the case that INFJs are overly controlling, or even want to be in control, in their relationships. As dominant Perceivers, they are generally healthiest when they allow life to come to them. Many INFJs have discovered that if they take it upon themselves to act and directly control outcomes, bad results often ensue. For INFJs, “action” can be understood as a direct employment of their inferior function (Se). And as I’ve discussed elsewhere, overt or direct employment of the inferior often produces undesirable outcomes. All of this is to say that the optimal role of INFJs in a relationship is generally a more receptive one, using their Ni and Fe to understand and interpret the world rather than trying to control it.
Another misconception about INFJs is that they are emotionally “needy.” This likely stems from the fact that INFJs extravert and readily express their emotions a la Fe. INFJs differ from the cultural norm in this respect, as the emotionally-restrained presentation of Fi predominates among American females. But just because INFJs are quicker to express their emotions does not make them any needier than FP types. In fact, since most men use Fe rather Fi (at least in the U.S.), they might appreciate the fact that, when paired with an INFJ, they needn’t guess about what their partner is feeling.
Yet another misunderstanding is the claim that INFJs “read into things that are not there” or “make mountains out of molehills.” Such accusations can be troubling for INFJs, since reading into things a la their Ni is what they are born to do. In most cases, such accusations derive not from any wrongdoing on the part of the INFJ, but from the assumptions or ego sensitivities of their partners. For instance, by saying things like “Are you okay?” or “You don’t seem yourself today” INFJs are trying to gather more information in order to better understand their partner. Unfortunately, their partner may interpret these as judgments or critiques, inciting a defensive response. If such exchanges were to occur regularly and without rectification, the INFJ might begin to introvert her feelings and doubt her own intuition, a sure recipe for personal and relational disaster.
(Source: http://personalityjunkie.com/infj-relationships-dating-love-compatibility/)
